Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: members have till February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it so much a deal. I believe it’s a request to resign with an unclear guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for up to eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that’s a really deceptive term to utilize in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there’s usually some sort of written contract or a concrete deal to supply a benefit in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your advice, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout severe care. There are no warranties included in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you change your mind, the firm’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, employment and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than meant can have major effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don’t wish to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And employment if they do not, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly providing to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes because there are no guarantees. And these are people who like their task. They enjoy the objective of the company. They work hard. And today, they’re facing extremely hard options, employment specifically if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and employment has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: employment Do you anticipate legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be honest, is so unmatched that I think a lot of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not aware of any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy companies to provide this number of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is quite perhaps setting the phase for challenges because I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for employment joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website terms of usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text might not be in its last type and might be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.